No Tax on Tips: What the OBBB § 224 Deduction Actually Means for Tipped Workers and Employers
Quick-read version · 1 minState-level treatment of the federal § 224 tip deduction for tax year 2026 (current as of May 2026). FTI-starting passthrough states (CO, OR, ID, ND) shown in green — Colorado uniquely conforms to § 224 despite separately decoupling from § 225 overtime. South Carolina shown in burnt orange (FTI-starting, currently add-back per SCDOR, two competing bills in play). AGI-starting jurisdictions with explicit non-conformity statements shown in amber. AGI-starting states with separate state-level provisions (Georgia HB 463 $1,750 tip exclusion; Arizona EO 2025-15) shown in blue. No-state-tax states shown in slate. Uncolored states default to AGI-starting with no passthrough by structural posture.
"No tax on tips" does not make every tip tax-free.
The new rule creates a federal income-tax deduction for qualified cash tips in listed tipped occupations. It does not remove Social Security tax, Medicare tax, withholding, or most state income tax.
For employers, the practical issue is reporting. Starting with 2026 W-2s, payroll has to separate qualifying tips from service charges, automatic gratuities, and tips paid in occupations that are not on Treasury's list.
The deduction lands at tax-filing time, not on the paycheck. And for the roughly 37% of tipped workers who already owe no federal income tax, the deduction may be worth $0 no matter how accurately it is reported.
The reporting cost is on the employer. For tax year 2026 (W-2s issued January 2027), separate disclosure is mandatory: Box 12 code TP for total cash tips reported to the employer, and Box 14b for the employee's Treasury Tipped Occupation Code (TTOC). If Box 14b is blank, the IRS may reject the worker's "no tax on tips" claim — your payroll system can functionally deny the deduction by silence. Penalties under IRC § 6721 for incorrect or omitted information returns are $310 per W-2, capped at $3.78M per year per employer (2026 figures).
The final regulations landed late. The IRS and Treasury published TD 10044 (April 13, 2026; 91 F.R. 19026; effective June 12, 2026) finalizing the list of 70+ tipped occupations and the "qualified tips" definition. The regs lock the occupation list to those "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024" — a structural cutoff that excludes any newly-tipping occupation from the deduction regardless of how an industry evolves.
Quick reference
- What qualifies: cash tips paid voluntarily by the customer (cash, check, card, gift card, electronic settlement / mobile app denominated in cash, casino chips and similar tokens, plus tip-pool / tip-share receipts) — to an employee in one of the 70+ Treasury-enumerated tipped occupations.
- What doesn't: service charges, automatic gratuities (the 18% added to a party of 8, "kitchen appreciation fees," mandatory banquet gratuities), digital-asset payments (cryptocurrency, NFTs, in-game tokens), exempt-employee policy "tips," tips in occupations not on Treasury's list.
- Annual cap: $25,000 per return (single OR joint). Below-the-line on new Schedule 1-A (Form 1040 line 13b); reduces taxable income, not AGI. Available whether the taxpayer takes the standard deduction or itemizes. Married filers must file jointly.
- MAGI phase-out: $100 reduction per $1,000 of MAGI above $150,000 (single) / $300,000 (joint). Fully phased out at $400,000 / $550,000.
- Effective: tax years 2025–2028. Sunsets December 31, 2028 absent extension.
- Employer reporting: voluntary 2025 W-2 Box 14 (Notice 2025-69); mandatory 2026 W-2 Box 12 code TP + Box 14b TTOC.
- State conformity (and where it diverges from "no tax on overtime"): California declines to conform (SB 711). New York adds back via IT-225 — but Gov Hochul's SB S587-A proposes a state-level tip exemption (targets tips only, not overtime). Colorado conforms to § 224 — even though it explicitly decoupled from the § 225 overtime deduction (HB 25-1296). Georgia HB 463 created a separate $1,750 state-level tip exclusion. Oregon affirmatively retained both tips and OT passthrough via SB 1507. Idaho HB 559 conforms to § 224. South Carolina's posture is in active legislative reconciliation.
The 5 Most Expensive Misconceptions
-
"No tax on tips" is not no tax. FICA (Social Security 6.2% + Medicare 1.45%, on every dollar of tip income, employer and employee shares) is unchanged. State income tax usually still applies. Federal income-tax withholding tables are unchanged — workers see the benefit at tax filing, not on each paycheck. Tip reporting to the employer is still required at $20+/month per IRC § 6053. A tipped worker who saw the headline and expected tax-free tips on their next paystub will be disappointed; communicate proactively.
-
Service charges and automatic gratuities are NOT tips. Per IRS Fact Sheet FS-15-08 and TD 10044, a tip is voluntary. The 18% added to a party of 8, the mandatory banquet contract gratuity, "kitchen appreciation fees," and any pre-set charge the customer didn't choose are service charges — wages to the employee, fully taxable, NOT § 224-deductible. Including them in Box 12 code TP inflates the deduction the worker claims and is a § 6721 violation at $310 per W-2. The restaurant industry has decades of confusion on this line; the 2026 W-2 reporting requirement crystallizes it.
-
Digital-asset tips don't qualify. Per TD 10044, cash tips must be "paid in cash or a cash equivalent... (excluding most digital assets) denominated in cash." Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFTs, in-game tokens — all out. Stablecoins (USDC, USDT) sit ambiguously between the "excluding most digital assets" parenthetical and the "denominated in cash" qualifier; the conservative posture until IRS issues clarifying guidance is to treat all digital-asset tips as outside § 224.
-
The December 31, 2024 occupation cutoff is structural. § 224(c)(1) restricts qualifying occupations to those that "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024." Treasury enumerated the list in TD 10044 — 70+ occupations spanning food service (TTOC 101 Bartenders; 102 Wait Staff), beauty (603 Barbers / Hairdressers / Cosmetologists), hospitality (bellhops, valets, concierges), transportation (taxi, rideshare, tour guides), entertainment (musicians, casino dealers), and miscellaneous services (golf caddies, doormen). Newly-tipping occupations cannot be added administratively — Treasury would need statutory amendment.
-
State conformity diverges between tips and overtime in some states. Colorado decoupled from § 225 (overtime) via HB 25-1296 but conforms to § 224 (tips) — an explicit legislative split per ITEP coverage, estimated ~$90M annual revenue cost. New York's IT-225 adds back both — but Gov Hochul's separate SB S587-A targets tips only, not overtime. The two deductions don't travel together in every state. Payroll systems that bucket them as a single "OBBBA conformity" flag will miscalculate state withholding in Colorado, and miss the New York state-level relief if S587-A passes.
Federal baseline — what § 224 actually says
The relevant statutory text is at 26 U.S.C. § 224, added by Section 70201 of P.L. 119-21. The definition that does the work — and that the rest of the regulation flows from — is in subsection (c):
"The term 'qualified tips' means cash tips received by an individual in an occupation which customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024, as provided by the Secretary." — 26 U.S.C. § 224(c)(1)
"For purposes of paragraph (1), the term 'cash tips' includes tips received from customers that are paid in cash or charged and, in the case of an employee, tips received under any tip-sharing arrangement." — 26 U.S.C. § 224(c)(2)
Three load-bearing limits flow from those two paragraphs:
- "Cash tips" is read broadly. Final regs TD 10044 expand the statutory text: cash tips include cash, check, credit card, debit card, gift card, electronic settlement and mobile-payment applications denominated in cash, and tangible or intangible tokens readily exchangeable for cash (casino chips named explicitly). Tip-pool / tip-share receipts qualify when received "under any tip-sharing arrangement" — voluntary or mandatory.
- "In an occupation" is read narrowly. Treasury's TD 10044 enumerates an exhaustive list of 70+ Treasury Tipped Occupation Codes (TTOCs). Tips received in occupations off the list are wages — fully taxable — even if structurally identical to qualifying tips.
- "On or before December 31, 2024" is the fixed cutoff. The list is the list. Treasury cannot administratively add a newly-tipping occupation; only Congress can.
§ 224(a) — the grant of the deduction
"There shall be allowed as a deduction an amount equal to the qualified tips received during the taxable year that are included on statements furnished to the individual pursuant to section 6041(d)(3), 6041A(e)(3), 6050W(f)(2), or 6051(a)(18), or reported by the taxpayer on Form 4137 (or successor)." — 26 U.S.C. § 224(a)
The four cross-referenced reporting statutes are the W-2, 1099-NEC, 1099-MISC, and 1099-K paths. Tips on Form 4137 — the worker-side unreported-tips return — also qualify; the worker pays the FICA they should have had withheld, but the deduction is still available. The gating mechanic is reporting, in some form.
§ 224(b) — cap and phase-out
- Cap: $25,000 per return (single or joint). Larger than § 225's $12,500-single cap. A single tipped worker has a larger ceiling than a single FLSA-overtime worker.
- Phase-out: reduce deduction by $100 per $1,000 of MAGI above $150,000 (single) / $300,000 (joint). Fully phased out at $400,000 / $550,000.
- MAGI definition: AGI + § 911 + § 931 + § 933 exclusions (foreign earned income, Puerto Rico, possessions).
- Married filing separately disqualifies. Joint filers share the $25,000 cap — a two-tipped-worker household has $25,000 total, not $50,000.
§ 224(d) — sunset
"No deduction shall be allowed under this section for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2028."
Four available tax years: 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028. Absent Congressional extension, tip income becomes ordinary taxable income again starting tax year 2029.
What counts toward Box 12 code TP (and what doesn't)
The single highest-leverage operational decision is which pay codes feed Box 12 code TP. Use this as the pre-flight checklist before tax-year 2026 closes:
| Counts toward Box 12 code TP | Does NOT count |
|---|---|
| Customer tips paid in cash, check, card, or electronic-payment app denominated in cash | Service charges, automatic gratuities (mandatory % added by the establishment) |
| Tip-pool / tip-share receipts received through a § 3(m)-compliant arrangement | "Kitchen appreciation fees," mandatory banquet gratuities, surcharges |
| Casino chips and tokens readily exchangeable for fixed cash | Digital-asset payments (cryptocurrency, NFTs, in-game tokens) |
| Allocated tips reported in Box 8 (large food / beverage establishment 8% rule) | Tips on Form 4137 if reported by the worker after the W-2 issues (still deductible, just not on Box 12 TP) |
| Tips in occupations on Treasury's TTOC list | Tips in occupations NOT on the list — Box 14b should be "000" |
| Tips paid to FLSA-nonexempt employees | "Tips" or policy gratuities paid to FLSA-exempt employees |
The 2026 W-2 also takes a new Box 14b for up to two TTOC codes. If an employee worked in two tipped occupations during the year, both codes go in. If an employee's occupation is off-list, Box 14b is "000". If Box 14b is blank, the IRS may reject the worker's "no tax on tips" claim per IRS draft instructions.
The single line that captures all of this: Box 12 code TP is voluntary cash tips in a qualifying occupation, full stop. The other variants are wages, and they're taxed as such.
Worked example
Maya works as a server at a casual-dining restaurant in Texas. Federal tip credit applies ($2.13 cash wage + tips bring total comp to at least $7.25/hour). She works 40 hours/week × 50 weeks = 2,000 hours. Her tax year 2026 totals:
- Customer tips paid via credit card: $15,000
- Customer tips paid in cash: $3,000
- Tip-pool share from food runners + bussers: $2,000
- Total cash tips: $20,000
- Direct cash wage: $4,260 (2,000 hours × $2.13)
- Gross W-2 wages (Box 1): $24,260
What Maya's 2026 W-2 (issued January 2027) reports:
- Box 1 (Wages): $24,260
- Box 3 + 5 (FICA wages): $24,260 — unchanged by § 224
- Box 12 code TP: $20,000 — her qualified cash tips
- Box 14b: TTOC 102 (Wait Staff)
What Maya claims on her 2026 Form 1040 (math reflects OBBB's 2026 single standard deduction of $16,100 per the IRS inflation-adjustment notice and the 10%-bracket ceiling of $12,400):
- AGI (Form 1040 line 11b): $24,260 — § 224 doesn't reduce AGI
- Schedule 1-A line 39 (§ 224 deduction): $20,000 — well under the $25K cap
- Pre-§-224 federal taxable income: $24,260 − $16,100 = $8,160 — entirely in the 10% bracket
- Pre-§-224 federal tax: $816
- Post-§-224 federal taxable income: $24,260 − $16,100 − $20,000 = capped at $0
- Post-§-224 federal tax: $0
- Federal tax savings from § 224: $816
Texas has no state income tax, so the $816 is Maya's complete benefit. A Maya in California with the same earnings sees the same $816 federal savings — but California declines to conform via SB 711, so she pays California state tax on the full $20,000 tip income at California rates. A Maya in Colorado sees the $816 federal plus state-level relief (Colorado conforms to § 224 even though it decoupled from § 225); at Colorado's 4.4% flat rate, the additional state savings on $20,000 is ~$880, total ~$1,696. The same worker, the same tips, three different outcomes depending on work state.
The savings scale with the marginal bracket and bind to the $25,000 cap. Compare three single tipped workers, all in tip-credit-prohibited states (no federal $2.13 cash wage; full minimum wage applies), all below the $150,000 MAGI phase-out threshold so the full deduction is available:
| Worker (single) | Base wage | Tips | Gross W-2 | § 224 deduction allowed | Approximate federal tax savings (2026 single brackets per Tax Foundation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maya (entry-level server, Texas — fed tip credit applies) | $4,260 | $20,000 | $24,260 | $20,000 | ~$816 — entirely in the 10% bracket (pre-deduction taxable income $8,160 sits below the $12,400 bracket ceiling). |
| Cesar (mid-career bartender, California — no tip credit) | $30,000 | $20,000 | $50,000 | $20,000 | ~$2,400 — pre-deduction taxable income $33,900 spans the 10% and 12% brackets; deduction zeros most of the 12%-bracket exposure. |
| Priya (fine-dining server, New York City) | $40,000 | $40,000 | $80,000 | $25,000 (capped) — only $25K of her $40K tips qualifies | ~$4,350 — deduction reduces mostly 22%-bracket income; the remaining $15K of tips stays taxable. |
Three lessons surface from the table:
- The deduction floor for a low-income tipped worker is the 10% bracket. Maya's $816 is the practical minimum for a worker whose full income sits in the bottom bracket. The Yale Budget Lab estimate (~37% of tipped workers owe no federal income tax) explains why some workers see $0 — they didn't owe federal income tax to begin with.
- The cap binds mid-career. Workers with $25,000+ in tips lose deduction on the marginal dollars. Priya's $40K in tips yields a $25K deduction; the $15K above-cap stays taxable.
- The phase-out doesn't kick in until $150K MAGI (single) / $300K (joint). All three workers above clear it. High-earning tipped workers (fine-dining sommelier with $200K+ MAGI, luxury hotel concierge) start losing the deduction at $100 per $1,000 of excess MAGI; the deduction zeroes at $400,000 / $550,000.
FLSA § 3(m) tip credit — interaction with § 224
The federal tip credit and the federal § 224 deduction live in different parts of the U.S. Code and answer different questions. The tip credit is about the employer's wage obligation under 29 U.S.C. § 203(m); § 224 is about the worker's federal income tax. They share the same underlying tip-income data but don't otherwise interfere.
- § 224 applies whether or not the employer claims a tip credit. A waitstaff worker in California (where state law prohibits the tip credit) gets the same § 224 deduction as a waitstaff worker in Texas (where the federal tip credit applies).
- § 224 doesn't change § 3(m). Employers must still ensure tips plus direct cash wage equals at least the applicable minimum wage for tip-credit hours. The deduction is on the worker's 1040; the wage floor is on the paystub.
- The 2026 W-2 Box 12 code TP data is the same data the employer needs for § 3(m) computation. "Cash tips reported to the employer" is the load-bearing input to both. Reporting burden isn't actually growing; the labeling is just becoming more visible.
The 80/20/30 rule — vacated August 23, 2024
The Department of Labor's 2021 final rule had codified the "80/20/30 rule": a tipped employee taking the tip credit had to spend at least 80% of work time on tip-producing duties, no more than 20% on "directly supporting" non-tipped work, and no more than 30 continuous minutes on non-tipped tasks. Falling below any threshold meant the employer lost the tip credit for those hours.
On August 23, 2024, the 5th Circuit vacated the DOL rule nationwide in Restaurant Law Center v. U.S. Department of Labor, No. 23-50562 (5th Cir. 2024). Applying the new Loper Bright standard (Supreme Court, June 2024), the panel held the rule "contrary to the FLSA's clear statutory text" and "arbitrary and capricious." The DOL has not issued a replacement rule; tip credit eligibility now turns on whether the worker is "engaged in a tipped occupation" without the 80/20/30 mechanical limits.
- Restaurant Law Center v. U.S. Department of Labor, No. 23-50562 (5th Cir. Aug. 23, 2024) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit — Vacated the DOL's December 2021 final rule (the 80/20/30 Tip Credit Rule) on a nationwide basis. Applying the new Loper Bright standard (Supreme Court, June 2024), the panel held the rule "contrary to the FLSA's clear statutory text" and "arbitrary and capricious." Effect: employers can apply the federal tip credit without minute-by-minute tracking of tipped vs non-tipped duties; the pre-2021 "engaged in a tipped occupation" standard applies. Does NOT change § 224 mechanics — the income-tax deduction still flows from cash tips received in a Treasury-enumerated occupation regardless of the tip-credit calculus.
The vacatur affects the wage side (employer can apply tip credit more liberally for hours the worker spends on side-work). It does NOT change the federal income-tax treatment under § 224 — that deduction still flows from "cash tips received... in [a Treasury-enumerated] occupation," regardless of the tip-credit calculus.
Stacking with "No Tax on Overtime"
OBBBA Section 70202 created the parallel deduction for FLSA-required overtime at new IRC § 225 — structurally identical to § 224 in shape (below-the-line on Schedule 1-A, same MAGI phase-out thresholds, same December 31, 2028 sunset) but different on every operational dimension:
| Dimension | § 224 (Tips) | § 225 (Overtime) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cap | $25,000 (single OR joint) | $12,500 (single) / $25,000 (joint) |
| W-2 box | Box 12 code TP | Box 12 code TT |
| Occupation/employment code | Box 14b TTOC (Treasury Tipped Occupation Code) | None |
| Eligibility gate | Treasury-enumerated tipped occupation + cash tip + customer voluntary | FLSA-required weekly-40 overtime + 0.5× premium portion only |
| Cap is per-individual or per-return? | Per return | Per return |
| Phase-out start | $150K MAGI single / $300K joint | Same |
| Sunset | Dec 31, 2028 | Same |
| Colorado state conformity | Conforms (passthrough; ~$90M/yr cost per ITEP) | Decoupled via HB 25-1296 add-back |
| New York pending state-level relief | SB S587-A targets tips only (pending) | Not addressed by S587-A |
A tipped server who also worked FLSA-qualifying overtime fills out both lines on Schedule 1-A. The two phase-outs trigger at the same MAGI thresholds, so a high earner phasing out of § 224 is also phasing out of § 225. Worth a sentence in employee FAQs at any restaurant, hospitality, or salon employer.
For the federal mechanic on the overtime deduction in detail, see our no-tax-on-overtime guide. For state-by-state treatment of § 225, see our no-tax-on-overtime-by-state tracker.
State conformity — where it lives, and where it diverges
State income-tax treatment of § 224 follows the same starting-point mechanic as § 225. § 224 is below-the-line federally, so it reduces federal taxable income (Form 1040 line 15) but NOT federal AGI (line 11b). A state's tax base starts from one of three places:
- Federal AGI (31 states + DC). § 224 never touches AGI, so the federal deduction has no automatic state-level effect. "Decoupling" is a clarification of the structural default, not a tax-mechanics change.
- Federal taxable income (5 states — Colorado, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina). § 224 passes through automatically unless the legislature explicitly adds it back.
- Own income classes (5 states — Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania). OBBBA provisions don't flow through without affirmative state legislation.
The four divergences from the § 225 (overtime) pattern worth knowing:
- Colorado conforms to § 224, decoupled from § 225. Colorado's HB 25-1296 (signed May 16, 2025) added back the federal § 225 overtime deduction to Colorado taxable income. The Colorado legislature did NOT enact an equivalent for § 224, so the tip deduction passes through. Annual revenue cost from the tips passthrough is approximately $90 million per ITEP.
- New York pending state-level tip exemption. New York's IT-225 add-back codes require workers to add back both the federal tip and overtime deductions for state purposes. Gov Hochul introduced SB S587-A on January 8, 2026, proposing a separate state-level exemption for up to $25,000 of tipped income. The Senate and Assembly have signaled support per CT Mirror coverage; the proposal targets tips only and not overtime. Status: pending Senate Budget+Revenue Committee, expected to pass in the 2026 state budget but not yet enacted.
- Georgia layered state-level $1,750 tip exclusion via HB 463. Gov Brian Kemp signed HB 463 on May 11, 2026. The bill creates a separate state-level exclusion of up to $1,750 in cash tips (and $1,750 in qualified overtime) for tax years 2026-2028. Georgia is AGI-starting structurally, so the federal § 224 deduction would not reduce Georgia taxable income regardless; the $1,750 state-level exclusion is a parallel provision on top.
- Idaho HB 559 conforms. Idaho is FTI-starting. Gov Brad Little signed HB 559 — Idaho's 2026 conformity bill — adopting § 224 and other OBBBA deductions. Per the Tax Foundation, Idaho's projected revenue impact for tax year 2026 is approximately $167 million.
States with confirmed non-conformity to § 224:
- California — non-conformity, $3.2B aggregate revenue protection (OT + tips combined). SB 711 (Chapter 231 of 2025 Statutes, signed October 1, 2025) set California's IRC conformity date to January 1, 2025 — six months before OBBB's enactment — putting § 224 structurally outside California's tax base. The FTB's November 2025 Tax News bulletin confirmed: "California does not conform to the deduction." California is also one of seven states that prohibit the federal tip credit entirely, so the combined posture for tipped workers is the strictest in the country (see the next section).
- Illinois — administrative add-back (~$267M combined). Illinois Department of Revenue / University of Illinois Tax School coverage confirms Illinois requires an add-back for both federal § 224 and § 225 deductions for state taxable income.
- Maine — Gov Mills declines to conform. Maine's October 1, 2025 Determination under P.L. 2025 c. 336 explicitly declined to conform to "no tax on tips" or "no tax on overtime." Mills's permanent conformity bill LD 2010 (introduced January 2026) is pending the Taxation Committee.
- South Carolina — contested. SC is the most volatile posture in the country. South Carolina is FTI-starting structurally, but the SCDOR conformity update page indicates SC has not conformed for tax year 2025 — federal tip deductions must be added back. Two competing bills are in play: H 3368 (one-year conformity, ~$534M FY 2026-27) and H 4216 (eliminate state income tax entirely; ~$309M loss in 2026 per ITEP). Verify SC's current posture before relying for material amounts.
- Arizona — Executive Order 2025-15. Gov Hobbs's November 25, 2025 EO 2025-15 directs Arizona Department of Revenue to add § 224, § 225, and three other OBBBA deductions to Form 140 — administratively, without enacted statute. Legally precarious; practitioner commentary (e.g., Ed Zollars CPA) flags the risk that an EO could be challenged.
State-by-state quick reference
A compact view of where the federal § 224 deduction actually changes state taxable income for tax year 2026. Tipped workers in passthrough states see federal plus state-level benefit; everywhere else, the federal deduction lands on the 1040 only.
| State | Starting point | § 224 effect for tax year 2026 | Source / mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | Federal AGI (static — 1/1/2025) | No passthrough; non-conformity statement | SB 711 Ch 231 of 2025 |
| Colorado | Federal taxable income (rolling) | Passthrough — distinct from § 225 add-back | Conforms; OT separately decoupled via HB 25-1296 |
| Georgia | Federal AGI (static — 1/1/2026) | No passthrough + separate state-level $1,750 tip exclusion | HB 463 (5/11/2026) |
| Idaho | Federal taxable income (rolling) | Passthrough confirmed | HB 559; ~$167M annual fiscal impact |
| Illinois | Federal AGI (rolling) | No passthrough; administrative add-back | IL DOR / IL OMB |
| Maine | Federal AGI (rolling) | No passthrough; Gov Mills Determination | LD 2010 pending |
| New York | Federal AGI (static) | No passthrough; state-level $25K exemption pending | IT-225 + SB S587-A (pending) |
| North Dakota | Federal taxable income (rolling) | Passthrough by default | No decoupling |
| Oregon | Federal taxable income (rolling) | Passthrough — affirmatively retained | SB 1507 (4/9/2026) |
| South Carolina | Federal taxable income (rolling) | Contested — currently add-back per SCDOR | H 3368 / H 4216 both pending |
| AK / FL / NV / NH / SD / TN / TX / WA / WY | n/a | Moot — no state income tax on wages | — |
Not exhaustive. The federal deduction is identical regardless of work state; the table shows differential effect on state taxable income. A 50-state companion grid mirroring the no-tax-on-overtime-by-state shape is on the discovery roadmap.
California — the strictest combined posture for tipped workers
California stacks three pressures on tipped workers that, in combination, produce the lowest combined federal-plus-state benefit in the country.
First, California prohibits the federal tip credit. California, along with Alaska, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington, requires employers to pay tipped employees the full state minimum wage in cash before any tips count. There is no $2.13-cash-wage equivalent in California. A tipped server in San Francisco earns at minimum $19.18/hour cash (San Francisco 2026 minimum); tips are additional, not a credit against the wage floor.
Second, California declines to conform to § 224. SB 711 set California's IRC conformity date to January 1, 2025 — six months before OBBB's July 4, 2025 enactment. § 224 (like § 225) is structurally outside California's tax base. The FTB has confirmed no California-level deduction for tipped income. Projected annual revenue protection from California's combined OT + tips non-conformity is approximately $3.2 billion.
Third, California Labor Code § 351 makes tips the property of the employee exclusively. California prohibits an employer from sharing in tips, deducting credit-card processing fees from tips, or counting tips against any required wage payment. Combined with the no-tip-credit posture, this means California-tipped workers see more of the cash but pay full California income tax on the federal § 224-deductible portion.
Things California-side payroll teams consistently miss
Box 12 code TP doesn't change in California. Box 12 TP is a federal information return required under IRC § 6051(a)(18). It reports cash tips identically regardless of state. The California Franchise Tax Board doesn't override it; the worker reports the federal Box 12 TP on Form 540 and adds the deduction back on Schedule CA (540) to compute California taxable income.
State withholding stays on the full tip amount. California computes state withholding on the worker's wages without § 224's reduction (since California is AGI-starting and rejected federal conformity). Payroll systems configured to derive California withholding from post-§-224 federal taxable income will under-withhold California state tax on tipped employees — an annual reconciliation problem at filing time.
The seven-state tip-credit-prohibition list intersects with § 224 in odd ways. Tipped workers in CA / NV / OR / WA / AK / MN / MT all earn full state minimum wage plus tips. The federal § 224 deduction is identical for them as for tip-credit-state workers. But Oregon affirmatively retained passthrough via SB 1507, while California declined — workers in the two prohibition states see meaningfully different state-level outcomes despite identical federal mechanics.
The expectations gap is sharp. "No tax on tips" was the marketing name; California-based tipped workers heard the headline and expected California-level relief. The reality is the lowest combined posture nationally — full federal cap applies, but California taxes every dollar at California rates. Year-end communications should set the expectation clearly.
Industry-specific patterns
The 70+ TTOCs span industries with very different tip-pool, side-work, and W-2-routing patterns. Five buckets matter most for payroll teams.
Restaurant and bar (TTOC 101 Bartenders, 102 Wait Staff, plus runners, hosts, sommeliers)
Highest-volume tip-pool participation across the cluster. Federal tip credit available in 43 states; prohibited in 7 (CA, NV, OR, WA, AK, MN, MT). Post-Restaurant Law Center vacatur, side-work treatment is more flexible — the 80/20/30 rule no longer caps how much non-tipped duty time the worker can do without losing the tip credit. The single most-common Box 12 code TP mis-coding is conflating cash tips with mandatory service charges (party-of-8 auto-gratuity, banquet contract gratuities, "kitchen appreciation fees"); audit pay codes before tax year 2026 closes.
Hospitality (bellhops, valets, concierges, hotel housekeepers)
Tips are typically cash + electronic, sporadic per shift. Tip-pool less common than in restaurant; many tipped roles operate independently. Valet operations may run through a third-party concession, which routes W-2 reporting through the concession employer rather than the hotel — confirm which entity issues each worker's W-2 before Box 12 code TP is populated.
Beauty and personal care (TTOC 603 Hairdressers / Barbers / Cosmetologists, plus manicurists, estheticians, massage therapists)
Independent-contractor (1099) booth-rental model is very common. Tips received by a 1099 worker route through Form 1099-NEC per IRC § 6041A(e)(3) or Form 4137 instead of Box 12 code TP. The booth-rental operator may issue a 1099-NEC; the worker should verify the 1099 reflects qualified tips before claiming § 224. Multi-state booth-rental practitioners face the misclassification angle of the overtime-rules-by-state cluster.
Transportation (taxi, rideshare, limo, shuttle, tour guides)
Rideshare drivers are typically 1099 (not W-2); tips received in-app flow through 1099-K per IRC § 6050W(f)(2). Drivers should verify their platform issues the 1099-K with qualifying tip amounts identified. Traditional taxi + limo + shuttle drivers may be W-2 employees of a fleet operator (Box 12 code TP applies); tour guides typically W-2.
Entertainment and recreation (TTOC casino dealers, golf caddies, ski instructors, fishing guides)
Casino chips and tokens are named in TD 10044 as cash equivalents — chip-denominated tips count as cash tips. Golf caddies and recreation instructors typically receive cash tips that are often unreported; the Form 4137 path applies for workers who didn't report tips to their employer above the $20/month threshold but want to claim § 224 on their return.
Multi-state and remote workers
The federal deduction is identical regardless of where the employee physically works. State income-tax treatment is sourced to the work state (with narrow exceptions for reciprocal arrangements). For the parallel multi-state treatment of overtime, see our no-tax-on-overtime-by-state guide.
Practical implication for a Texas-headquartered restaurant chain with locations in California and Colorado: federal Box 12 code TP + Box 14b TTOC are identical across all three states. State treatment diverges — Texas workers see the federal deduction with no state effect (Texas has no income tax), California workers see federal but full state tax on the tipped amount, Colorado workers see federal plus state-level passthrough. Payroll teams need a per-state withholding configuration for tipped employees; the W-2 reporting itself doesn't change.
Recent changes
Six events have shaped the OBBB tips-deduction rollout from signing to sunset. The W-2 reporting events plus the final regs (TD 10044) are the load-bearing compliance dates; state-DOR guidance is still rolling out in some jurisdictions.
- July 4, 2025 — OBBB signed (P.L. 119-21). Section 70201 adds § 224 to the IRC. Effective retroactively to tax years beginning January 1, 2025.
- September 22, 2025 — Proposed regs REG-110032-25. Treasury / IRS published the proposed list of qualifying occupations and the "qualified tips" definition for public comment. The Treasury preliminary list (PDF dated August 27, 2025) became publicly available the same week.
- November 21, 2025 — IRS Notice 2025-69. Confirms 2025 W-2 / 1099-NEC / 1099-MISC / 1099-K are unchanged for tax year 2025; employees calculate the deduction from pay records. Employers may voluntarily disclose 2025 cash tips in Box 14 of the 2025 W-2.
- January 12, 2026 — IRS finalizes 2026 W-2. New Box 12 code TP + new Box 14b TTOC become mandatory for tax year 2026 W-2s (issued January 2027). IRS 2026 General Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3 finalize the form.
- March 2026 — IRS Fact Sheet FS-2026-04. Schedule 1-A explainer covering all four OBBB above-the-cap deductions (tips, overtime, car loan interest, senior).
- April 13, 2026 — Final regs TD 10044. Treasury / IRS publish final regulations (91 F.R. 19026-19056) finalizing the 70+ TTOC list and the "qualified tips" definition. Effective June 12, 2026. The final regs adopt the September 2025 proposed regs without substantive change.
- Q2 2026 — State conformity guidance. Oregon SB 1507 (April 9, 2026) affirmatively retained both tips and OT passthrough. Idaho HB 559 confirmed § 224 conformity. Georgia HB 463 (May 11, 2026) created the state-level $1,750 tip exclusion. New York SB S587-A (introduced January 8, 2026) pending. Maine LD 2010 pending Taxation Committee.
- December 31, 2028 — Sunset. § 224(d) sunsets the deduction for tax years beginning after December 31, 2028. Four available tax years: 2025-2028. Absent Congressional extension, qualified tips become ordinary taxable income again starting tax year 2029.
In how many states does the federal "no tax on tips" deduction actually reduce my state tax bill?
Four states pass the federal deduction through to state taxable income for tax year 2026: Oregon, Colorado, Idaho, and North Dakota. All four start state taxable income from federal taxable income (Form 1040 line 15), which is the line § 224 reduces. Oregon affirmatively retained the passthrough via SB 1507 (signed April 9, 2026). Colorado conforms to § 224 — distinct from its treatment of § 225 overtime, which Colorado decoupled via HB 25-1296 (signed May 16, 2025). Idaho confirmed conformity via HB 559. North Dakota has not enacted decoupling. South Carolina is structurally FTI-starting but currently requires an add-back per SCDOR; H 3368 and H 4216 are both pending. Every other state's tax base starts from federal AGI (Form 1040 line 11b) or its own income classes, so § 224 has no automatic effect on state taxable income.
Does California honor "no tax on tips"?
No. California Senate Bill 711, signed by Governor Newsom on October 1, 2025 (Chapter 231 of 2025 Statutes), amended Revenue and Taxation Code § 17024.5(a)(1) to set California's IRC conformity date to January 1, 2025 — six months before OBBB's July 4, 2025 enactment. § 224 is structurally outside California's tax base. The California Franchise Tax Board November 2025 Tax News bulletin confirmed: California does not conform to either federal "no tax on overtime" or "no tax on tips." Projected aggregate annual revenue protection from California's combined OT + tips non-conformity is approximately $3.2 billion. California also prohibits the federal tip credit — workers receive full state minimum wage plus tips, never the federal $2.13/hour cash wage. Combined, this gives California-based tipped workers the lowest combined federal-plus-state benefit in the country.
Does "no tax on tips" apply in Texas?
Texas has no state income tax on wages, so the state-conformity question is moot. Tipped workers in Texas get the full federal § 224 deduction on their 1040 — capped at $25,000 with the MAGI phase-out starting at $150,000 single / $300,000 joint — without any state-side wrinkle. Employer Box 12 code TP and Box 14b TTOC reporting on the 2026 W-2 (issued January 2027) is still required regardless of state. The same federal reporting requirement under IRC § 6051(a)(18) applies in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire (no income tax on wages), South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming — nine total no-income-tax-on-wages states.
What occupations qualify for the § 224 deduction?
Treasury enumerated 70+ qualifying Treasury Tipped Occupation Codes (TTOCs) in TD 10044 (published in the Federal Register April 13, 2026; 91 F.R. 19026; effective June 12, 2026). Major examples include TTOC 101 (Bartenders), TTOC 102 (Wait Staff), TTOC 603 (Barbers / Hairdressers / Hairstylists / Cosmetologists), plus hospitality (bellhops, valets, concierges, hotel housekeepers), transportation (taxi, rideshare, limo, tour guides), entertainment (casino dealers, musicians), recreation (golf caddies, ski instructors, fishing guides), and miscellaneous service (shoeshine, doormen, parking attendants). The occupation must have "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024" per IRC § 224(c)(1) — a structural cutoff. Newly-tipping occupations cannot be added administratively; only Congress can amend the list. The official IRS list lives at irs.gov/forms-pubs/occupations-that-customarily-and-regularly-received-tips-on-or-before-december-31-2024.
Are tips paid via credit card or app eligible? What about cryptocurrency?
Card, app, and similar electronic-cash tips are eligible; cryptocurrency and other digital-asset tips are not. Per TD 10044, "cash tips" include cash, check, credit card, debit card, gift card, electronic settlement / mobile-payment applications denominated in cash (Venmo, PayPal, Cash App, Zelle when the underlying unit is USD), and tangible or intangible tokens readily exchangeable for fixed cash amounts (casino chips named explicitly). Payments in digital assets — cryptocurrency, NFTs, in-game tokens — are NOT cash tips. The "denominated in cash" qualifier excludes them. Stablecoins (USDC, USDT) sit ambiguously between TD 10044's "excluding most digital assets" parenthetical and the "denominated in cash" qualifier; the conservative posture until IRS issues clarifying guidance is to treat all digital-asset tips as outside § 224.
Do automatic gratuities (the 18% on parties of 8) count as tips?
No. Per IRS Fact Sheet FS-15-08 and TD 10044, a tip is voluntary. The 18% added to a party of 8, the mandatory banquet contract gratuity, "kitchen appreciation fees," and any other pre-set charge the customer didn't choose are service charges — wages to the employee, fully taxable, NOT deductible under § 224. The worker's share of a service charge is FICA-taxable wages, not a tip. Including service charges in Box 12 code TP inflates the deduction the worker claims on their 1040; the penalty for incorrect or omitted information returns under IRC § 6721 is $310 per W-2 (2026 figures), capped at $3.78 million per employer per year. The restaurant industry has decades of confusion on the tip-vs-service-charge line; the 2026 W-2 reporting requirement crystallizes it.
Why does Colorado tax overtime but not tips?
Colorado is a federal-taxable-income-starting state with rolling conformity. Both § 225 (overtime) and § 224 (tips) would pass through automatically absent decoupling legislation. The Colorado legislature explicitly added back § 225 via HB 25-1296 (signed May 16, 2025, Section 6 amending CRS § 39-22-104; ~$119M projected annual revenue protection) but did NOT enact a parallel add-back for § 224. As a result, Colorado conforms to the federal tip deduction — tipped workers in Colorado see federal § 224 plus Colorado-level relief at Colorado's flat 4.4% rate. The estimated annual revenue cost to Colorado from § 224 passthrough is approximately $90 million per ITEP. This split (decoupling from OT but conforming to tips) is the most consequential state-conformity divergence between § 224 and § 225 in the country and is the load-bearing reason payroll systems that treat OBBBA conformity as a single flag will miscalculate Colorado state withholding for tipped workers.
What's the difference between § 224 (tips) and § 225 (overtime)?
Both are below-the-line federal income-tax deductions on new Schedule 1-A, both phase out at $150K MAGI single / $300K joint, both sunset December 31, 2028. The differences: § 224 caps at $25,000 per return (single OR joint); § 225 caps at $12,500 single / $25,000 joint — so a single tipped worker has twice the maximum of a single FLSA-overtime worker. § 224 uses W-2 Box 12 code TP plus Box 14b TTOC; § 225 uses Box 12 code TT (no occupation code). § 224 eligibility requires a Treasury-enumerated tipped occupation and a customer-voluntary cash tip; § 225 eligibility requires FLSA-required weekly-40-hour overtime and is the 0.5× premium portion only. A tipped server who also worked FLSA overtime fills out both Schedule 1-A lines on the same return. State conformity diverges in Colorado (conforms to tips, decoupled from OT) and pending in New York (SB S587-A targets tips only).
What's the status of New York's state-level tip exemption?
Governor Hochul introduced Senate Bill S587-A on January 8, 2026, proposing a state-level exemption for up to $25,000 of tipped income for tax year 2026 — amending NY Tax Law § 612 to allow taxpayers to deduct cash and credit card tips received during the year. The bill targets tips only, NOT overtime. The Senate Committee on Budget and Revenue has not yet reported the bill out; both the Senate and Assembly have signaled support, and the proposal is expected to be approved in the 2026 state budget. As of late March 2026, it has not been formally enacted. New York City alone is projected to lose approximately $239 million annually if the bill enacts. Until enactment, New York's IT-225 add-back codes require workers to add back the federal § 224 deduction to state taxable income, and the federal exempt-tip income remains taxable at New York rates.
My state passed an OBBBA bill — does it affect § 224?
Not necessarily — read the bill carefully. Massachusetts HB 4975 (Healey, January 15, 2026) proposes temporary non-conformity to selected OBBBA provisions, but the bill specifically addresses IRC §§ 174A, 163(j), 168(n), 179(b), and 1400Z — not § 224. Virginia HB 29 (Chapter 7 of 2026 Acts, signed February 20, 2026) decouples from § 168(k), § 168(n), §§ 174 / 174A, and modifies § 163(j); the bill does not address § 224. In both states, § 224 has no state effect anyway because both are AGI-starting structurally. Maine LD 2010 (pending Taxation Committee) explicitly proposes to NOT conform to either tips or overtime per Governor Mills's October 2025 Determination. The "state passed an OBBBA bill" framing in industry press sometimes conflates structural non-passthrough (AGI-starting baseline) with statutory non-conformity (legislative add-back). Whether the bill mentions § 224 by section number or substantive description is the right question to ask.
I have tipped workers in multiple states. How do I configure payroll?
Three checks. First, audit your payroll system's state-by-state tax-base configuration — every state where you have a tipped worker has a starting-point posture (federal AGI vs federal taxable income vs own income classes) that determines whether § 224 reduces state taxable income. Second, set the conformity flag separately for § 224 (tips) and § 225 (overtime); Colorado is the main reason — conforms to tips, decoupled from OT — and treating them as a single flag will miscalculate Colorado state withholding. Third, ensure state withholding in the AGI-starting non-conformity states (CA, NY, IL, ME, HI, CT, DC) is computed on the full tip amount (pre-§-224) rather than the post-§-224 amount. Verify each work-state flag in your master file against your payroll vendor's OBBBA-update bulletin. Also ensure each tipped employee has a TTOC in Box 14b — a blank Box 14b may cause the IRS to reject the worker's § 224 claim per IRS draft instructions.
If You Discover You've Been Doing This Wrong
Most of the reporting risk is forward-looking: tax-year 2026 W-2s (issued January 2027) are the first compliance event with mandatory Box 12 code TP + Box 14b TTOC. The action items are setup and audit, not remediation, with one exception (Form 4137 path for workers who under-reported tips during 2025).
-
Audit payroll system pay-code tracking. Confirm the system can isolate cash tips (customer-voluntary, in any qualifying payment form) separately from service charges, mandatory gratuities, and any digital-asset payments. Check your payroll vendor's OBBBA-update bulletin for Box 12 code TP and Box 14b TTOC support before the 2026 plan year closes.
-
Cross-walk your employees to TTOC codes. Pull the IRS list of qualifying occupations and assign a TTOC to every tipped employee. Update employee master records with their primary TTOC; for employees in two qualifying tipped occupations, capture both codes (Box 14b accepts up to two). Workers in non-qualifying tipped roles should be coded "000".
-
Reconcile service charges and automatic gratuities. Pull every pay code in your payroll system labeled "tip," "gratuity," "service charge," "fee," or similar. Categorize each: customer-voluntary cash tip (Box 12 TP eligible), automatic-or-mandatory service charge (wages, NOT Box 12 TP), or other. This is the single most common misreporting trap; the restaurant industry has decades of confusion on the line.
-
Audit tip-pool allocations. Tip pools that include both qualifying-occupation workers (servers, bartenders) and non-qualifying workers (back-of-house kitchen staff post-2018) are common. The qualifying-occupation worker's pooled share is § 224-deductible; the non-qualifying worker's share is NOT. Document the allocation methodology so Box 12 code TP reflects the correct amount per employee.
-
Communicate proactively to employees. Year-end materials, pay-stub explainers, and FAQ pages should flag the four most common misconceptions: (1) no withholding change, (2) FICA still applies, (3) state tax usually still applies, (4) sunset in 2028. The communications cost of a confused tipped workforce dwarfs the reporting cost of getting Box 12 right.
-
Set a state-decoupling watch. State DOR guidance is still rolling out through 2026 in many states. Colorado's tips-conform-but-OT-decouple split is uncommon; verify your payroll system handles divergent state-conformity flags for the two deductions. Subscribe to state DOR bulletins for every state you have tipped employees in.
-
If a 2025 misreporting error is discovered post-filing, the relief mechanism is a corrected W-2 (Form W-2c) for the employer side, and Form 4137 (Social Security and Medicare Tax on Unreported Tip Income) for the employee side. Notice 2025-69 explicitly bypasses mandatory 2025 reporting, so most "errors" don't exist as such — but unreported tips above $20/month per IRC § 6053 still need to land somewhere for § 224 to be claimed.
Cross-cluster pickups
§ 224 sits at the intersection of multiple wage-hour clusters. Each cross-link names the specific overlap, not just topical adjacency:
- Overtime regular rate × tip credit. Tipped employees taking the federal tip credit who work FLSA-required overtime have a non-trivial regular-rate computation: the regular rate is the actual cash wage PLUS tips up to the minimum wage, not the cash wage alone. See our overtime-rules-by-state guide for the full regular-rate mechanic; the Box 12 code TT amount (FLSA overtime premium) is calculated from this regular rate.
- § 226 derivative cascade in California. California Labor Code § 226 requires wage statements to disclose nine items, including the regular rate. Misreporting tips through Box 12 code TP affects the regular rate computation in California, which cascades into derivative § 226 claims for incorrect wage statements. See pay-stub-requirements-by-state for the cascade mechanic; tipped employees in California face a higher § 226 exposure than tipped workers elsewhere.
- Recordkeeping. Tip records under 29 CFR § 516.6 — daily and weekly tip records, tip-credit notice to the employee, tip-pool allocation records. Multi-state retention varies per recordkeeping-requirements-by-state.
- Off-the-clock side-work for tipped employees. Pre-shift setup, rolling silverware, post-closing cleanup — the Restaurant Law Center vacatur changed how DOL views the tip-credit treatment of side-work, but doesn't change the underlying FLSA exposure for unrecorded compensable time. See off-the-clock-work-by-state for the compensable-time mechanic.
- Predictive scheduling for tipped restaurant workers. Service-industry workers in NYC, SF, Chicago, Philadelphia, Emeryville, Seattle, LA, Berkeley, Oregon, and other Fair Workweek jurisdictions face additional scheduling and premium-pay rules; see predictive-scheduling-laws-by-state.
The through-line
Every misreporting risk in § 224 traces back to two phrases in subsection (c)(1): "cash tips" (excludes service charges, automatic gratuities, and digital-asset payments) and "in an occupation which customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024" (locks the list to Treasury's enumeration; newly-tipping occupations cannot be added administratively). Isolate exactly that slice in your payroll system — customer-voluntary cash tips in a TTOC-coded occupation — and the rest of the compliance work follows. Get either phrase wrong on the W-2 and the inflated or denied deduction becomes a § 6721 violation at $310 per W-2 across every affected employee.
The good news: the pay-code separation work is the same compliance you'd do for accurate FLSA regular-rate calculation, accurate § 3(m) tip-credit application, and accurate § 226 wage-statement disclosures regardless of OBBB. If Congress extends or makes the deduction permanent in 2028, the audit work doesn't need to be redone. If it expires, you have cleaner payroll data anyway. Build it now and it earns its keep either way.
Sources
Federal statute and Treasury / IRS guidance
- 26 U.S.C. § 224 — Qualified tips (Cornell LII)
- Federal Register TD 10044 — Occupations + qualified tips definition (April 13, 2026; 91 F.R. 19026)
- Treasury Department — Detailed Tipped Occupations List (PDF, 8/27/2025)
- IRS — Occupations that customarily and regularly received tips on or before Dec. 31, 2024
- IRS Notice 2025-69 — 2025 transition relief (PDF)
- IRS — What the "No Tax on Tips" deduction means for you
- IRS — Schedule 1-A, Additional Deductions (FS-2026-04)
- IRS — One Big Beautiful Bill: tips and overtime deductions
- IRS — Tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2026 (with OBBB amendments)
- IRS — Tip recordkeeping and reporting
- IRS Fact Sheet FS-15-08 — Tips vs Service Charges (PDF)
Form W-2 + tip reporting
- IRS 2026 General Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3 (PDF)
- PayrollOrg — IRS releases 2026 Form W-2 with OBBBA changes
- 26 U.S.C. § 6053 — Reporting of tips (Cornell LII)
- 26 U.S.C. § 6051(a)(18) — W-2 reporting of tips
- IRS — About Form 4137 (Social Security and Medicare Tax on Unreported Tip Income)
FLSA tip credit + Restaurant Law Center
- 29 CFR Part 531 Subpart D — Tipped Employees (eCFR)
- DOL Fact Sheet #15 — Tipped Employees Under the FLSA
- DOL — Minimum Wages for Tipped Employees by State
- Restaurant Law Center v. U.S. Department of Labor, No. 23-50562 (5th Cir. August 23, 2024)
- Littler Mendelson — Fifth Circuit Vacates DOL 80/20/30 Rule
Employer + tax-advisor analysis
- RSM US — Final rules confirm qualifying occupations and tip definition
- Thomson Reuters Tax — Final rule on tips deduction released
- Current Federal Tax Developments — Technical analysis of TD 10044
- EY Tax News — IRS finalizes regulations on IRC § 224
- Proskauer Rose — No Tax on Overtime and No Tax on Tips: Key Considerations for Employers
- Frazier & Deeter — Tip Deduction 2025 Eligibility & Rules
State conformity
- ITEP — Conforming to the "No Tax on Tips" Gimmick
- Thomson Reuters — Which states are decoupling from federal tax provisions
- Tax Foundation — Big Beautiful Bill State Tax Impact
- California Franchise Tax Board — November 2025 Tax News
- Idaho State Tax Commission — Update on 2025 conformity (March 2026)
- Maine — Pierce Atwood on Gov Mills's Determination
- New York State Senate Bill 2025-S587A
- Georgia Governor — Kemp signs HB 463 (May 11, 2026)
- Colorado HB 25-1296 (FTI add-back)
- South Carolina H 3368 fiscal impact statement
- SC DOR — IRC Conformity Update
Keep reading
Overtime Rules by State: What Employers Need to Pay
Overtime rules by state for employers: federal 40-hour overtime, daily overtime states, California double-time, 7th-day premiums, exemptions, and common payroll mistakes.
No Tax on Overtime by State: Which States Honor the OBBB Deduction and Which Don't
OBBB's § 225 overtime deduction by state — only 4 states pass it through (OR/ID/ND/SC); Colorado decoupled by statute (HB 25-1296); 7 jurisdictions issued non-conformity statements; the rest never had a passthrough.
No Tax on Overtime: What the OBBB Deduction Actually Means for Employers
OBBB's IRC § 225 overtime deduction explained — what qualifies, the $12,500 cap, why California daily OT doesn't count, state tax limits, and 2026 W-2 Box 12 code TT reporting.
Off-the-Clock Work Laws by State
The 5 most expensive off-the-clock mistakes — federal Portal-to-Portal vs California's stricter "control" test, the named cases (Frlekin, Troester, Tyson), and remote-work exposure.
About Clockspot
Clockspot helps small businesses track employee time and keep payroll-ready records. Used in all 50 states since 2007, we focus on getting time and pay right — including the wage-and-hour rules that shape both.
Clockspot tracks tip income separately from base wages and overtime — so payroll categorizes what qualifies for Box 12 code TP and Box 14b TTOC correctly, no matter how many tipped occupations an employee works. See how Clockspot tracks tipped employees.