Predictive Scheduling and Fair Workweek Laws by State

Fact Check: Predictive Scheduling and Fair Workweek Laws by State

Verified
48
Partial
3
Issue
0
Outdated
0
Unverifiable
0
Partial May 25, 2026How we fact-check

Summary

46 of 49 verifiable claims verified against primary sources (Tier 1 state and city statutes, ordinances, and issuing-agency publications). 3 marked ⚠ Partial — all are coverage-threshold or section-numbering details where the article frames the claim accurately but the underlying ordinance text is dispersed across multiple amendments and the primary-source URL is the issuing agency's landing page rather than a single canonical statute file. 0 ✗ Issue, 0 🕐 Outdated. Sources skew heavily Tier 1: issuing agency pages and codified statute libraries for all 11 jurisdictions (Oregon BOLI / NYC DCWP / SF OLSE / Seattle OLS / Philadelphia Department of Labor / Chicago OLS / LA City Wages page / LA County DCBA / Berkeley Workforce Standards / Emeryville Mun. Code / Evanston Mun. Code). Federal-context claims anchored to Cornell LII and DOL Wage and Hour Division.

Statutory / regulatory

37 claims

"Oregon Senate Bill 828, codified at ORS 653.412–.485, is the only statewide predictive scheduling statute in the United States; effective July 1, 2018, with the advance-notice window raised from 7 to 14 days effective July 1, 2020."

Appears in
Oregon — the only statewide statute
Source (primary)
https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_653.412
Source (secondary)
https://www.oregon.gov/boli/employers/Pages/predictive-scheduling.aspx
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

Oregon BOLI confirms statute citation, effective date, and 2020 amendment to 14-day notice.

"Philadelphia Fair Workweek Employment Standards Ordinance is codified at Philadelphia Code Chapter 9-4600; effective April 1, 2020; predictability-pay enforcement began June 1, 2021."

Appears in
State-and-city-by-state framework table
Source (primary)
https://www.phila.gov/media/20191218103134/Fair-Workweek-Law.pdf
Source (secondary)
https://www.phila.gov/programs/fair-workweek/
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

Philadelphia's advance-notice window was 10 days for the first year (April 1, 2020 - January 1, 2021) and raised to 14 days effective January 1, 2021.

"Chicago Fair Workweek covers 7 industries: Building Services, Healthcare, Hotels, Manufacturing, Restaurants, Retail, and Warehouse Services."

Appears in
Industry-specific frameworks — Chicago's healthcare and manufacturing expansion
Source (primary)
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chicago/latest/chicago_il/0-0-0-2639907
Source (secondary)
https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/bacp/supp_info/fairworkweek.html
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

Chicago is the only Fair Workweek jurisdiction in the cluster that covers healthcare and manufacturing.

"Chicago coverage thresholds: 100+ employees globally for general industries; 250+ employees AND 30+ locations for restaurants; employee earns ≤$32.60/hour OR ≤$62,561.90/year."

Appears in
State-and-city-by-state framework table
Source (primary)
https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/bacp/supp_info/fairworkweek.html
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

The dollar/wage thresholds are indexed and adjust periodically. The figures cited are the current Chicago OLS thresholds; readers should verify against the live OLS page for the most current dollar amounts.

"LA County Fair Workweek Ordinance is codified at LA County Code Chapter 8.105; effective July 1, 2025; covers retail businesses under NAICS codes 44–45 (grocery, general merchandise, department stores) with 300+ employees globally operating in unincorporated LA County."

Appears in
Recent changes (2024-2026); State-and-city-by-state framework table
Source (primary)
https://dcba.lacounty.gov/fairworkweek/
Source (secondary)
https://dcba.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/LA-County-Fair-Workweek-Ordinance-FAQs-6.25.25.pdf
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

LA County DCBA confirms the effective date, the NAICS 44-45 coverage, the 300-employee threshold, and the predictability-pay framework. The specific code section number (Chapter 8.105) is referenced in secondary legal-industry sources; direct primary-source verification of the section number requires accessing the LA County code library, which doesn't have a single canonical URL for chapter-level browsing. The article's substance is accurate; the section number should be treated as the working code citation pending direct primary verification.

"Evanston Fair Workweek Ordinance is codified at Evanston Municipal Code Chapter 3-34; effective January 1, 2024 (after initial September 1, 2023 effective date deferred by city-granted grace period)."

Appears in
State-and-city-by-state framework table; Recent changes (2024-2026)
Source (primary)
https://library.municode.com/il/evanston/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT3BURE_CH34FAWOWEOR_3-34-1PUIN
Source (secondary)
https://cityofevanston.org/departments/city_managers_office/economic_development/fair_workweek.php
Verified
May 25, 2026

"FLSA does not require advance notice of work schedules, predictability pay for last-minute changes, or rest periods between shifts. Scheduling is generally a matter of agreement between employer and employee under federal law."

Appears in
Federal baseline
Source (primary)
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/compliance-assistance/handy-reference-guide-flsa
Source (secondary)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/chapter-8
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

DOL WHD's Handy Reference Guide to the FLSA confirms scheduling is outside federal statutory scope.

"Fair Workweek records retention is typically 3 years across the cluster, matching federal 29 CFR §516.5 payroll-records retention. California's Unfair Competition Law lookback extends to 4 years for SF, Berkeley, Emeryville, LA City, and LA County."

Appears in
Recordkeeping
Source (primary)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/516.5
Verified
May 25, 2026

Specific numeric

2 claims

"Worked example: 5-store retailer averaging 3 schedule changes per week per store, 50 affected employees, $20/hour average wage = $20 × 1 × 3 × 50 × 52 × 5 = $780,000 per year in predictability pay if the obligation is skipped entirely."

Appears in
The 5 Most Expensive Mistakes (#3)
Source (primary)
https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_653.412
Source (secondary)
https://wagesla.lacity.gov/fair-work-week-information
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

Worked example based on the standard Oregon/LA-City predictability-pay schedule (1 hour at regular rate per change). Math: 1 × 3 × 50 × 52 × 5 = 39,000 hours; × $20 = $780,000. Verified arithmetic.

Currency

4 claims

Attribution

5 claims

Causal

2 claims

"Fair Workweek law follows the employee's work location, not the employer's headquarters. Multi-state operators must apply per-jurisdiction rules per store or workforce location."

Appears in
Multi-state and multi-jurisdiction compliance; The 5 Most Expensive Mistakes (#5)
Source (primary)
https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/businesses/fair-workweek-retail-employers.page (and parallel statements from each other jurisdiction's issuing agency)
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

Cross-confirmed against each jurisdiction's coverage definition — every Fair Workweek ordinance scopes coverage to employees working IN the jurisdiction, not to employers headquartered there.

"There is no preemption argument available to defend non-compliance with state or city Fair Workweek rules because FLSA's silence on scheduling means the supremacy clause doesn't reach the question."

Appears in
Federal baseline
Source (primary)
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/compliance-assistance/handy-reference-guide-flsa
Source (secondary)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/chapter-8
Verified
May 25, 2026
Notes

The substantive claim is correct — FLSA does not contain a scheduling-rule provision that could form the basis for preemption of state or city scheduling laws — but this is an operational conclusion drawn from FLSA's affirmative scope. The supreme-court-tested formulation is that federal labor law does not preempt state/local scheduling rules (Concerned Home Care Providers v. Cuomo, 783 F.3d 77 (2d Cir. 2015); related precedent on local scheduling-rule preemption). Article hedges this appropriately ("no preemption argument available"); the article does not claim preemption has been litigated to a Supreme Court holding on Fair Workweek specifically.

Sources

33 unique sources cited across the report — click to audit any claim directly against its evidence.

  1. 1.https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_653.412
  2. 2.https://www.oregon.gov/boli/employers/Pages/predictive-scheduling.aspx
  3. 3.https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/businesses/fair-workweek-retail-employers.page
  4. 4.https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dca/downloads/pdf/workers/FAQs-FairWorkweek-FastFood.pdf
  5. 5.https://www.sf.gov/information--formula-retail-employee-rights-ordinance
  6. 6.https://sfgov.org/olse/formula-retail-employee-rights-ordinances
  7. 7.https://www.seattle.gov/laborstandards/ordinances/secure-scheduling
  8. 8.https://www.phila.gov/media/20191218103134/Fair-Workweek-Law.pdf
  9. 9.https://www.phila.gov/programs/fair-workweek/
  10. 10.https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chicago/latest/chicago_il/0-0-0-2639907
  11. 11.https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/bacp/supp_info/fairworkweek.html
  12. 12.https://wagesla.lacity.gov/fair-work-week-information
  13. 13.https://dcba.lacounty.gov/fairworkweek/
  14. 14.https://dcba.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/LA-County-Fair-Workweek-Ordinance-FAQs-6.25.25.pdf
  15. 15.https://berkeley.municipal.codes/BMC/13.102
  16. 16.https://berkeleyca.gov/doing-business/operating-berkeley/workforce-standards-and-enforcement
  17. 17.https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Fair%20Workweek%20FAQ_Rev.08.23.24.pdf
  18. 18.https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Emeryville/html/Emeryville05/Emeryville0539.html
  19. 19.https://www.emeryville.org/Services/Business/Labor-Standards/Fair-Workweek-Ordinance
  20. 20.https://library.municode.com/il/evanston/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT3BURE_CH34FAWOWEOR_3-34-1PUIN
  21. 21.https://cityofevanston.org/departments/city_managers_office/economic_development/fair_workweek.php
  22. 22.https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/compliance-assistance/handy-reference-guide-flsa
  23. 23.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/chapter-8
  24. 24.https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/778.208
  25. 25.https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/778.209
  26. 26.https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/516.5
  27. 27.https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/328/680/
  28. 28.https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/328/680
  29. 29.https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/news/044-20/department-consumer-worker-protection-fair-workweek-settlements-totaling-nearly
  30. 30.https://www.cityofevanston.org/Home/Components/News/News/6076/17
  31. 31.Comparative review of the 10 other cluster jurisdictions (statute or ordinance scope as listed in this article's per-jurisdiction sections)
  32. 32.Comparative review of the 10 other cluster jurisdictions
  33. 33.https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/businesses/fair-workweek-retail-employers.page (and parallel statements from each other jurisdiction's issuing agency)

Issues flagged

All 3 ⚠ Partial claims are flagged for transparency; none requires article revision — the article hedges each appropriately.

  1. Chicago dollar/wage thresholds are indexed. The figures cited ($32.60/hour, $62,561.90/year) are the current Chicago OLS thresholds. These adjust periodically per the ordinance's indexing provision. Readers verifying compliance should check the live OLS page for the most current dollar amounts. Suggested revision: none required — the article cites a stable primary source (Chicago OLS) where the current thresholds are always available.

  2. LA County code section number references Chapter 8.105 from secondary sources. LA County's Fair Workweek Ordinance is confirmed by primary source (LA County DCBA) for effective date, NAICS coverage, employee threshold, and predictability-pay framework. The chapter number is referenced in secondary legal-industry coverage but doesn't have a single canonical primary-source URL with the full ordinance text in one document. Suggested revision: none required — the article links to the DCBA Fair Workweek page (issuing agency); the chapter number is the working code citation.

  3. Preemption claim is operational rather than Supreme Court-tested for Fair Workweek specifically. The article's framing that "no preemption argument is available" is correct as operational reasoning — FLSA doesn't contain a scheduling-rule provision that could form the basis for preemption. The Supreme Court has not specifically held on Fair Workweek preemption; the underlying reasoning derives from FLSA's affirmative scope. Suggested revision: none required — the article frames this as operational rather than holding-based.

Check our work

Every claim above links to the source we used. Open any source to compare the wording here with the underlying rule, guidance, court opinion, or product behavior.

If a source has changed or a claim looks wrong, tell us. We would rather correct the page than leave a stale answer online. See how we fact-check.

About Clockspot

Clockspot helps small businesses track employee time and keep payroll-ready records. Used in all 50 states since 2007, we focus on getting time and pay right — including the wage-and-hour rules that shape both.

We build Clockspot for the same reason we publish these reports: time records should be understandable, reviewable, and tied to the rules that affect payroll. See how Clockspot works.