"The federal rule is one sentence in the U.S. Code — 29 USC §207(a)(1)."
- Source (primary)
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/207
- Verified
- May 27, 2026single source
- Notes
Cornell LII displays the §207(a)(1) text in one sentence:
We checked 86 claims in this overtime research against statutes, regulations, rulemaking records, agency guidance, state-law sources, and court opinions. 64 verified directly. No claims are marked Partial, Issue, or Outdated. 22 are marked Unverifiable because the cited public source could not be inspected during this review, not because a contradictory source was found.
This report covers the claims an employer would rely on before classifying workers or running payroll: the 40-hour federal overtime rule, salary-basis and duties-test requirements, the 2024 salary-threshold vacatur, regular-rate math, multi-rate work, bonus apportionment, fluctuating-workweek limits, state daily-overtime overlays, California double-time and 7th-day rules, industry carve-outs, state-by-state timing, recordkeeping, and named cases.
The strongest source layer is the federal and state law itself. Federal statutes and regulations are anchored to Cornell LII, rulemakings to govinfo PDF originals, and state rules to official state sources or stable public mirrors such as California leginfo, Massachusetts malegislature, New York DOL Wage Order Part 142, Nevada leg.state.nv.us, and Oregon public.law. The report covers federal law, all 50 states, and 17 named cases.
Ship verdict: the research can ship as an audit-backed source layer, but the 22 Unverifiable entries are real caveats. They mostly involve DOL fact sheets and case-opinion pages that are public for a reader to click but were not inspectable in this review. The underlying statutory or regulatory rule is independently verified where possible; entries that depend only on the inaccessible source stay labeled Unverifiable so the reader can see the limitation.
45 claims
"The federal rule is one sentence in the U.S. Code — 29 USC §207(a)(1)."
Cornell LII displays the §207(a)(1) text in one sentence:
"A 'workweek' is whatever 7-day period you choose ... Once you choose it, you can't shift it to dodge overtime (29 CFR §778.105)."
§778.105 displays: "An employee's workweek is a fixed and
"Each workweek stands alone. A worker who does 50 hours one week and 30 the next owes 10 hours of overtime on the 50-hour week (29 CFR §778.104)."
Cornell page text: "The Act takes a single workweek as
"The federal definition (29 USC §207(e)) is broad: every dollar of pay counts toward the regular rate, except for eight specific things."
§207(e) text on Cornell enumerates eight exclusions —
"Hospitals/residential care/skilled nursing can elect a 14-day work period under 29 USC §207(j); overtime then kicks in at 8 hours in a workday OR 80 hours across 14 days."
§207(j) text on Cornell: "a work period of fourteen
"Public agencies that employ fire-protection or law-enforcement personnel can use work periods of 7 to 28 days; fire: 53 hours per 7 days (up to 212 per 28); police: 43 hours per 7 days (up to 171 per 28)."
§553.230 displays the 212/171 cap and the
"Executive exemption (29 CFR §541.100): primarily manages, directs 2+ employees, has hiring/firing authority or particular weight in recommendations."
§541.100 text confirms all four prongs: salary basis at
"Administrative exemption (29 CFR §541.200): office work directly related to management or general business operations, requiring discretion and independent judgment on significant matters."
§541.200 text matches each prong verbatim.
"Learned professional exemption (29 CFR §541.301): advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning, customarily acquired through specialized intellectual instruction."
§541.301 text matches; the regulation lists "law,
"Creative professional exemption (29 CFR §541.302): work requiring invention, imagination, originality, or talent in a recognized artistic field."
§541.302 quotes "invention, imagination, originality or
"Outside sales exemption (29 CFR §541.500): no minimum salary; primarily making sales away from the employer's place of business."
§541.500 displays: "The requirements of subpart G
"Salary basis rule (29 CFR §541.602): paid a predetermined amount each pay period that doesn't drop based on quality or quantity of work."
§541.602 displays the "predetermined amount" /
"29 CFR §541.604(b) requires a guarantee of at least the minimum weekly salary regardless of days/shifts worked, with a reasonable relationship between guarantee and earnings."
§541.604(b) displays both the guarantee requirement and
"Salaried non-exempt computation (29 CFR §778.113): regular rate = salary ÷ intended hours."
§778.113 displays: "the regular hourly rate of pay, on
"Fluctuating workweek method (29 CFR §778.114(a)): five conditions — hours actually fluctuate, salary fixed, minimum-wage floor at highest hours, mutual understanding, 0.5× premium over 40."
§778.114(a) displays all five conditions as enumerated
"The 2020 FWW Final Rule (85 Fed. Reg. 34970, June 8, 2020) clarified that bonuses, premiums, commissions, hazard pay can be paid under FWW so long as those amounts are folded into the regular-rate calculation."
85 Fed. Reg. 34970, June 8, 2020 confirmed on
"Weighted average (29 CFR §778.115): regular rate for multi-rate workers = total straight-time earnings ÷ total hours."
§778.115 displays: "his total earnings ... are computed
"29 CFR §778.209: when a non-discretionary bonus covers more than one workweek, apportion it back and recompute the regular rate."
§778.209 displays "apportioned back over the workweeks
"29 CFR §778.211: discretionary bonus requires both the fact of payment and the amount to be at the employer's sole discretion, decided near the end of the period."
§778.211 quotes "both the fact that payment is to be
"Retroactive pay raises (29 CFR §778.303): overtime premium must be recomputed for the retroactive period."
§778.303 displays: "if an employee is awarded a
"The 2019 Regular Rate Final Rule (84 Fed. Reg. 68736, effective Jan 15, 2020) added expense reimbursements, wellness benefits, tuition assistance, and certain unused-leave payouts to the §7(e) exclusion list."
GPO PDF retrieved as encoded binary that the parser
"29 CFR §516.2(a) recordkeeping requirements: personal info, workweek start, daily and weekly hours, basis of pay, regular hourly rate, straight-time and overtime earnings, additions/deductions, total wages, date of payment and pay period."
§516.2 displays each of the enumerated record
"California adds a fourth year through its Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §17200)."
BPC §17200 defines unfair competition broadly. The 4-
"Massachusetts triples the damages outright (MGL c.151 §1B)."
Section displays: "An employee so aggrieved who prevails
"New York reaches six years back (NY Lab. Law §198)."
§198(3) displays the six-year statute of limitations
"Bonus discretion test (29 CFR §778.211): both fact of payment AND amount must be at sole discretion, decided near the end of the period."
Already verified above; restated here because the claim
"Federal §7(g)(2) escape hatch lets you pay at the rate of the work performed during the overtime hour only if there's a written agreement before the work and both rates are bona fide."
§207(g)(2) appears in Cornell §207 page; conditions
"California Labor Code §510(a): 1.5× over 8 hours/day; 1.5× over 40 hours/week; 2× over 12 hours/day; 1.5× first 8 hours of 7th consecutive day; 2× hours over 8 on 7th consecutive day."
§510(a) text on leginfo displays each of the five
"California Labor Code §511: alternative workweek schedules require two-thirds secret-ballot vote; up to 10 hours per day straight time."
§511 text displays the two-thirds requirement and the
"California doesn't allow a tip credit (Labor Code §351)."
§351 displays: "Every gratuity is hereby declared to be
"Alaska AS 23.10.060: 8h/day daily overtime; 40h/week weekly overtime."
Alaska DOL page displays: "may not employ an employee
"Kentucky KRS §337.050: 7th-day premium pay at 1.5× for all hours."
The Kentucky legislature URL did not expose readable
"Nevada NRS §608.018: 8h/day overtime applies to workers earning less than 1.5× the state minimum wage."
NRS §608.018 page displays: "An employer shall pay 1
"Colorado COMPS Order: 12h/day overtime at 1.5×; agricultural 60h."
cdle.colorado.gov could not be inspected in this review.
"Oregon ORS §653.265: 10h/day overtime in canneries, dryers, and packing facilities. Oregon ORS §653.272: agricultural overtime stepping from 55h (2024) to 48h (2025) to 40h (2027)."
ORS §653.265 verified for the 10-hour-per-day rule in
"Pennsylvania 43 P.S. §333.104; PMWA prohibits FWW."
The PA DLI URL 301-redirects to a parent agency page,
"New York overtime rule at 12 NYCRR §142-2.2 (1.5× over 40h, 44h for live-in domestic); 6-year statute of limitations at NY Lab. Law §198."
NY DOL's published Wage Order Part 142 displays the
"29 USC §213(b)(1): Motor Carrier Act overtime exemption applies to vehicles weighing more than 10,000 pounds."
§213(b)(1) appears on Cornell. The 10,000-pound
"Technical Corrections Act of 2008 narrowed the Motor Carrier Act exemption for vehicles 10,000 pounds or under."
The Public Law 110-244 text on govinfo.gov referenced
"29 USC §213(b)(12): agricultural overtime exemption (all farms). 29 USC §213(a)(6)(A): small-farm exemption from both minimum wage and overtime for farms employing ≤500 man-days of agricultural labor in any quarter of the previous year."
Cornell §213 displays both subsections. §213(b)(12)
"29 USC §203(m): tip credit — tips don't enter the regular rate."
§203(m) defines the tip credit mechanic; tips
"29 CFR §516.2 recordkeeping plus state-law overlays means tracking where each hour was worked is the foundation."
§516.2 verified above; the location-tracking conclusion
"Federal statute of limitations: 2 years; 3 years for willful violations (29 USC §255(a)). Liquidated damages double the recovery (29 USC §216(b))."
§255(a) text confirmed: "may be commenced within two
"29 USC §260: good-faith defense to liquidated damages."
§260 displays the "if the employer shows to the
"Massachusetts MGL c.151 §1A: 40-hour weekly overtime requirement."
§1A displays the 40-hour rule and the 1.5× rate. Note:
8 claims
"40 hours in a workweek, 1.5× the regular rate."
40-hour threshold and 1.5× rate appear verbatim in
"Exemption requires all three: salary basis (29 CFR §541.602), salary threshold $684/week ($35,568/year) under the DOL's 2019 Final Rule, and the duties test."
The 2019 Final Rule PDF on govinfo.gov displays the
"Computer exemption (29 CFR §541.400): $684/week or $27.63/hour minimum; primarily systems analysis, programming, software engineering."
§541.400 displays "$27.63 an hour" and references
"Highly compensated employee threshold: $107,432/year from the DOL's 2019 Final Rule, codified at 29 CFR §541.601."
The 2019 Final Rule (84 Fed. Reg. 51230) sets the highly-
"California's exempt salary threshold is 2× the state minimum wage at 40 hours/week — $68,640/yr at the 2025-2026 minimum of $16.50/hr."
California Lab. Code §515(a) sets the "2× state minimum
"The 2024 DOL Final Rule (vacated) at 89 Fed. Reg. 32842 (April 26, 2024) raised the threshold to $844/week (effective July 1, 2024) and $1,128/week (effective January 1, 2025), highly compensated to $151,164."
GPO PDF at govinfo.gov confirms 89 Fed. Reg. 32842
"California's exempt salary threshold rose to $68,640/yr on January 1, 2025 with the minimum-wage increase to $16.50/hr."
$16.50 × 2 × 40 × 52 = $68,640. DIR wage-order index
"Colorado's COMPS Order 40 retained the $1,057.69/week threshold for 2025."
cdle.colorado.gov could not be inspected in this review. Note also that the
5 claims
"Federal law doesn't require daily overtime. It only cares about the weekly total."
§207(a)(1) sets only the 40-hour weekly threshold. No
"DOL Fact Sheet #54 walks through the 8-and-80 election in plain language."
The DOL page could not be inspected in this review.
"DOL Fact Sheet #8 walks through §7(k) in plain language."
The DOL page could not be inspected in this review.
"DOL Fact Sheet #82 is the DOL's plain-language summary."
The DOL page could not be inspected in this review.
"Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders and California Labor Commissioner enforce: hours physically worked in California are governed by California overtime."
DIR wage-order index page is reachable. The
18 claims
"Helix Energy Solutions Group v. Hewitt, 598 U.S. 39 (2023): a worker pulling in over $200,000 a year on a daily-rate structure was ruled non-exempt because the rate structure failed the salary-basis test."
Cornell Supreme Court text confirms caption, 598 U.S.
"Corning Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188 (1974): employer bears the burden of proving every element of the exemption. Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 584 U.S. 79 (2018): FLSA exemptions get a 'fair reading,' rejecting the prior narrow-construction canon."
Cornell pages display both opinions. Corning established
"Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel, 316 U.S. 572 (1942) — codified by 29 CFR §778.114."
Cornell page displays the 316 U.S. 572 (1942) opinion;
"Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946): when employer records are missing or deficient, the employee carries a low bar (reasonable inference) and the employer must come forward with evidence of the precise amount of work performed."
Cornell page quotes the burden-shift language verbatim:
"Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, 577 U.S. 442 (2016): extended Mt. Clemens to class actions; representative evidence is admissible when employer's records are inadequate."
Cornell displays the opinion; Kennedy majority applied
"Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., 4 Cal. 5th 542 (2018): California uses non-overtime hours only as the divisor for flat-sum bonus regular-rate calculation, producing a higher rate than the federal method."
Justia could not be inspected in this review; the official
"Skyline Homes, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 165 Cal. App. 3d 239 (1985): California rejects the fluctuating workweek method; Lab. Code §510 controls."
The Justia page could not be inspected in this review.
"Alvarado extends the four-year UCL window to flat-sum bonus claims; the case applied retroactively, so claims reach four years back from filing."
Justia source access was unavailable. Retroactive application is the
"Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, 11 Cal. 5th 858 (2021): the §226.7 missed-break premium must use the full regular rate (including non-discretionary bonuses and shift differentials), not just base hourly."
The Justia page and California courts PDF could not be
"Marshall v. Brunner, 668 F.2d 748 (3d Cir. 1982): leading case for regular-rate computation with §3(m) plus multi-rate work."
The Justia page could not be inspected in this review.
"O'Brien v. Town of Agawam, 350 F.3d 279 (1st Cir. 2003)."
Justia source access was unavailable. Manual click needed to confirm.
"Chavez v. City of Albuquerque, 630 F.3d 1300 (10th Cir. 2011)."
Justia source access was unavailable. Manual click needed to confirm.
"Chevalier v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc., 220 A.3d 1038 (Pa. 2019): Pennsylvania rejects the fluctuating workweek method."
The Justia page could not be inspected in this review.
"November 15, 2024 — State of Texas v. United States Department of Labor, No. 4:24-cv-499, 2024 WL 4806268 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2024) vacated the 2024 DOL final rule."
The CourtListener storage URL returned 404 in this
"Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co., 325 U.S. 419 (1945)."
Cornell page displays the case at 325 U.S. 419 (1945).
"Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Aaron, 334 U.S. 446 (1948)."
Cornell page displays the case at 334 U.S. 446 (1948);
"149 Madison Ave. Corp. v. Asselta, 331 U.S. 199 (1947)."
Cornell page displays the case at 331 U.S. 199 (1947).
"Flood v. New Hanover County, 125 F.3d 249 (4th Cir. 1997)."
The Justia page could not be inspected in this review.
2 claims
"California, Pennsylvania, and Alaska reject the fluctuating-workweek method (CA Lab. Code §510; PA 43 P.S. §333.104 + Chevalier v. GNC; AK 23.10.060)."
California Lab. Code §510 and Alaska AS 23.10.060
"States following federal only: 25 states (see table)."
Counted from the state-by-state table: AL, AR, AZ, DE,
6 claims
"Jen worked example: 30h × $20 + 20h × $30 = $1,200; weighted regular rate $24.00/hour; OT premium 10 × 0.5 × $24.00 = $120; total $1,320."
Arithmetic reconciles: (30×20)+(20×30) = 600+600 = 1,200;
"$1,300 quarterly attendance bonus over 13 workweeks = $100/week added to the regular rate."
Arithmetic reconciles: 1,300 ÷ 13 = 100. Apportionment
"Retroactive raise example: $20→$22 over 8 weeks at 5 OT hours/week = $720 straight-time back pay + $120 overtime back pay."
Arithmetic reconciles. Straight-time back pay: 8 × 45 ×
"Misclassified coordinator at $50K, 10 unpaid OT hours/week, doubled by federal liquidated damages, across 2-3 years ≈ $52,000 per worker."
Arithmetic check at the rough level. At $50,000/yr ÷
"California Alvarado method: $20/hr × 50 hrs + $200 weekend bonus → CA regular rate $25.00/hr, OT premium $75 on the bonus, total $1,375; vs. federal $24.00 / $120 / $1,320 ⇒ $55 more per worker per week."
Arithmetic check passes independently of the case URL.
"Marcus worked example: $20/hr at a 30-person warehouse in Sacramento; 50 hours with $200 weekend bonus; federal method total $1,320 vs. Alvarado method $1,375 — $55 difference per worker per week."
Arithmetic check passes (see earlier flat-sum bonus
2 claims
"May 5, 2026 — The Fifth Circuit dismissed the government's appeal in Texas v. DOL."
The research body asserts this date but does not cite a
"May 14, 2026 — The DOL formally rescinded the 2024 final rule."
No primary source linked in the research body for the
74 unique sources cited across the report — click to audit any claim directly against its evidence.
Every claim above links to the source we used. Open any source to compare the wording here with the underlying rule, guidance, court opinion, or product behavior.
If a source has changed or a claim looks wrong, tell us. We would rather correct the page than leave a stale answer online. See how we fact-check.
Clockspot helps small businesses track employee time and keep payroll-ready records. Used in all 50 states since 2007, we focus on getting time and pay right — including the wage-and-hour rules that shape both.
We build Clockspot for the same reason we publish these reports: time records should be understandable, reviewable, and tied to the rules that affect payroll. See how Clockspot works.